Rats! This doesn't solve my problem. Apparently, though, according to your word, Ernie, it's not because of ISG1
I have been flight simming for over two years. I can recognize the differences in performance between flights using the same plane. True, the Posky 737-700 is known for its inability to slow down quickly. I've experienced that in my pre-ISG1 use of it. It's inability to slow down is documented in many simming forums. BUT, regardless of your disclaimer, The Posky 737-700 inability to slowdown quickly is greatly, and I mean, greatly, exacerbated when flying with ISG1. I am not saying this in a pejorative sense, but simply as an observation of an obvious difference in performance between flying the Posky using ISG1 and not using it.
Again, on a recent flight between LPMA and GCTS, flying the Posky, at level flight (2800 feet), with LNAV disengaged, never engaging VNAV on the flight at all, it simply would not slow down. I turned off autothrottle, I was not using the autopilot to control speed. My saitek throttle quadrant was in the idle position. My speed brakes were fully deployed, and I had to put the landing gear down at about 220-230kts and deploy almost full flaps at inappropriate speeds, which in the rw would have damaged them, just to get the plane to slow down to 160 kts!
I have never had that happen to me before. In the previous flight in which I used ISG1 (LEMG-LPMA), it was very similar.
BTW, Ernie, thanks for taking the time for explaining the differences between isg.cfg files. I hope you don't sense any animosity toward you or your product. There is none. I really am enjoying the product and it has greatly enhanced my flying with it. I'm just making an observation based upon my experience with the Posky 737-700 and ISG1 which, if I don't find a solution to, will preclude its use with the Posky, which I use a lot with several VA's I fly for.
|